Wilson Pro Staff 97l V13. Wilson Pro Staff 97L v13 Tennis Racquet Midwest Sports The Pro Staff 97L v13 provides a lighter and more maneuverable frame for any player who craves the classic Pro Staff precision and feel, but prefers a more arm-friendly swing weight The Wilson Pro Staff 97 v13 is one of my favorite updates to the Pro Staff line in years, which I expect will resonate with.
Wilson Pro Staff 97L V13, Sports Equipment, Sports & Games, Racket & Ball Sports on Carousell from www.carousell.sg
The Pro Staff 97, 97L and 97UL also gets a new drill pattern for the grommets. Taking another step down in weight from the 97, the 97L or 'light' version of the Pro Staff is 10.2 oz (289g) unstrung, making it considerably more approachable and a reasonable entry point for many players.
Wilson Pro Staff 97L V13, Sports Equipment, Sports & Games, Racket & Ball Sports on Carousell
Wilson Pro Staff 97L V13; The new RF97 is simply a refresh of its predecessor and maintains Federer's exact specs, wheres the 97, and 97L get the new braided graphite, carbon weave on the hoop and the rounder Wilson grip abenson added racket Babolat Pure Aero 7 months: hilarity1199 added a stringing of HEAD Lynx 17 to Yonex EZONE 98 (305g) 7 months: The technology update includes a 'braid 45 construction that arranges the double braided fibers at 45 degree angles for enhanced pocketing feel alongside incredible stability'.
Wilson Pro Staff 97L v13 TopSpin Tennis Shop. abenson added racket Babolat Pure Aero 7 months: hilarity1199 added a stringing of HEAD Lynx 17 to Yonex EZONE 98 (305g) 7 months: Similarities: Both versions have a 97in head size and the same strung weight (306g), racket length (27in), balance (3pts HL), beam width (23.5 mm), and string pattern (16 x 19).
Wilson Pro Staff 97L v13 Review and Playtest Win Big Sports. This model comprises a new construction, Braid 45, that increases precision by arranging the carbon fibers at 45. Main Differences: The V14 of the Pro Staff 97L has a higher swing weight (313 vs 311), and a slightly lower stiffness rating (68 vs 69)